Tag Archive for 'Web 2.0'

Page 2 of 4

Experimental politics

BloggerAustria’s conservative peoples party invited a handful bloggers to cover the annually party convention. Obviously not more than a PR experiment, but an interesting one, and, frankly, one I wouldn’t have expected from that side of the political landscape.

Besides inviting bloggers, the party will be posting videos on YouTube and photos to Flickr, making friends on MySpace and even is represented in Second Life. Seems like they got some social media budget to play with.

Politicians writing blogs, doing podcast, vlogs or generally participating personally in Web 2.0 (to name the buzzword) are nothing new. As one could observe during US elections those are quite powerful methods to create awareness. At the same time it must be handled carefully. Social media is controlled by the people, beyond the influence of PR departments or press agencies. Once the wrong message is out it can’t be controlled any more and, as we know, bad news are spreading fast, much faster than good news.

Since social media popularity in Europa isn’t as high as in the US, there is still some room for (safe) experiments left, like this one of the peoples party. Blogs surely offer a clever possiblity to reach certain audiences, still a small but increasing target group (as far as I know blogs are currently read by bloggers in the first place) and partly acting as multiplicators.

So what does it mean to invite known and rather popular bloggers instead of advising the own press department to set up and maintain a blog?

The invited bloggers can’t be said to be conservative or traditional peoples party followers. They simply had the opportunity to watch the convention, presentations and speeches (from the best press table btw) and blog about it, or not, don’t if they were asked to write at least a minimum of words on their blogs.

There is no such thing as bad publicity except your own obituary.
(Brendan Behan)

The result of that experiment is mainly a controversial discussion about the party, speeches, concepts, etc. in the blogosphere. Even a post titled “7 reasons why I will not vote for this party” from one of the invited bloggers showed up.

Inviting guest bloggers were in that case quite a good option: the posts are not directly seen as marketing activity and therefore leave a more honest impression than other initiatives. It doesn’t really matter if the posts are positive or negative. Suddenly blog readers receive an entire stream of posts about the peoples party. Posts which trigger follow-ups (like this post), lead to discussions within the blogosphere and create even more awareness about the party. Hey, otherwise I never ever would’ve thought about or even mentioned the party convention.

After all, I think it was a very clever move.

Mini blogging

tumblrtumblr is a fantastic way to quickly set up sort of a mini blog, a blog with less fuss as they say, very straightforward. While you can embed pretty much everything that comes as RSS, your readers can’t leave comments or trackbacks. Tumblelogs are only mono-directional, perfectly suitable to flood Web 2.0 with even more exciting stuff.

Anyhow, I played a while around with it and merged almost my entire digital life into one single super feed. Just to give those profilers out there a helping hand.

Viacom’s slipstream

In the slipstream of Viacom’s YouTube lawsuit the Austrian Broadcasting is thinking about sueing YouTube because of copyright infringements too. It won’t be a billion dollar lawsuit though, for a company of Google’s dimension the Austrian Broadcasting wouldn’t be more than a tiny breakfast I guess, but there are some other points I don’t get about it:

In my country every household owning a TV must pay more than 20 Euros per month to the Austrian Broadcasting, just for having the opportunity to watch their program, even if you don’t do so. One of their most recent plans is to charge the same fees for computers with internet access too. Because as internet user without a TV set one could find alternative ways to watch their TV shows on the internet. Oh, and not to forget their 6x6cm 40sec Windows Media IPTV service. Now that’s what we’ve all waited for!

So, on the one hand they want my money, arguing that my computer is equipped with internet access (like the majority of computers I suppose), and on the other hand they try to bring services down where I, as internet user and their paying costumer, can, among other things, consume their TV shows the way and whenever I want it.

Instead of finding ways to benefit from web communities like YouTube – strangely enough that super duper DVB-T is threatened by 8x6cm crappy flash video clips – they prefer to fight it. Great.

Asking for creativity in some companies is probably asking for too much.
[youtube _OmuBUUcA2M]

Gate keepers

TurkeyTubePublic censorship is never a good way when trying to establish democracy and a liberal society. Blocking entire sites, especially a popular web community where a considerable part of your population participates, sends definitely the wrong signals.

Content is still the affair of the web site owner and it’s their business to decide how to deal with offensive contributions in web communities for instance. As state you just define the legal framework and if the web site plays within your legal framework it’s ok, otherwise it’s illegal and can be forbidden based on your laws.

For me as citizen it would be alarming if my government starts banning sites because they politically don’t agree with parts of its content. I still prefer to have the choice which articles I read or what videos to watch, even if they are dumb and stupid, and I certainly wouldn’t accept politically motivated internet gate keepers in my country.

Web 2.0 panel talk

This was posted already on several weblogs, but still it’s worth mentioning: an excellent panel talk at the World Economic Forum in Davos about

The rapid rise of online social networks is both a social and business phenomenon, the impact of which is only beginning to be understood. The consumer-powered Web 2.0 creates innovative ways for businesses to operate and people to communicate.

1. What is driving the emergence of virtual communities? Is the rapid rise in their valuations justified?
2. How are companies beginning to use social networking strategies for product and market development, as well as for communication?

Discussants:

  • Caterina Fake, Founder, Flickr, USA
  • William H. Gates III, Chairman, Microsoft Corporation, USA
  • Chad Hurley, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, YouTube, USA
  • Mark G. Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer, Nike, USA
  • Viviane Reding, Commissioner, Information Society and Media, European Commission, Brussels
  • Dennis Kneale, Managing Editor, Forbes Magazine, USA

[googlevideo 7818852908161786954]

Too active community

A part of the Viennese Flickr community is apparently active enough to play semantical tricks on the algorithm behind Yahoo!’s TagMap World Explorer, a mapping application based on Flickr’s geotags and associated other tags (read more here).

If you see the map below (or open up that map) you’ll find the tag guessedvienna as large as some other popular place names, mostly sightseeing attractions where probably many different users apply the same tag for their photo taken at that particular place (assuming that this is, in short, the idea how TagMap World Explorer works).

Guessedvienna results from the Guess Where Wien (Vienna) Flickr group, a very popular group among local Flickr users here. Basically it’s a game where users post a picture and other users have to guess where it has been taken. All guessed photos are tagged with guessedvienna. It’s fun to play because it lets you discover many unknown and interesting spots in Vienna. Geotagging is of course a welcome feature in this group, it makes it a lot easier to indicate exactly where the photo was taken.

Btw, the tag Zentralfriedhof (the main cemetery of Vienna) surprises me too. I knew of some conspirative Flickr meet ups there, but didn’t expect it as one of the most popular tags in Vienna.

However, I think it’s a good example where folksonomy makes sense for certain users, while it can be completely useless information for other applications or people.

Business toys

Just had a quick look at 8apps, well at the screencasts since it’s an invitation-only beta. Turning Web 2.0, mostly fun, applications into business tools looks interesting and, from my point of view, definitely has potential to ease and improve certain work flows.

The only concern that came to my mind was about the storage. Companies won’t be very happy if employees start working with sensible business information on company-external servers. (seen in the nonsmoking area)

Blog niches

Besides all SEO hints or tricks to make it onto digg’s front page, choosing the right content is the most crucial point on attracting blog visitors and readers. As we all know, content is still king.

TechCrunch’s post about eroshare demonstrated very well the potential behind the combination of web 2.0, porn and religion: more than 150 comments engaged in a heated and interesting discussion.

Person of the Year 2006

As approx. 800 million other people who participated in whatsoever Web 2.0 application this year, I’ll update my resume today and add the line

Person of the Year 2006, Time Magazine

to my references.

Btw, while it might look like a brilliant Linkbait strategy to some of us, I heavily doubt that Time Magazine is in the need of increasing backlinks by some shady tricks, like some us do.