Tag Archive for 'Virtual Earth'

Second Light

Second Light is a new development of MS research on Microsoft’s multi-touch device Surface. It basically allows to display additional information in some kind of hidden light layer above the Surface screen. That way, extra map layers, like labels, can be shown on top of a base map without covering geographic objects for instance. It seems to be an interesting option for visualizing and exploring geographic content – makes me wonder when we see Virtual Earth demoing on Surface.

The video below gives a quick demo of how Second Light works.

[via rolf generated content]

Update:

The All Points Blog covers Second Light too, along with other new GeoGoodies from Microsoft.

Vienna in 3D

Just in time before the EURO 2008 starts, we got Vienna in 3D from Microsoft Virtual Earth:

Now the only thing missing are more 3D apps which make use of that amazing technology! [via Twitter d]

Birds Eye View has landed!

Virtual Earth got a 35.13 terabyte data update yesterday and covers now some Austrian cities with Birds Eye View too:

  • Innsbruck
  • Klagenfurt
  • Linz
  • Salzburg
  • St. Pölten
  • Villach
  • Wels

The Lentos Art Museum in Linz:

Lentos Linz

Vienna didn’t make into that update, so I can’t check my rooftop right now, but according to the MSDN team blog Vienna 3D is going to be added within the next couple of months to Virtual Earth.

Maybe we can already explore 3D stadiums in Virtual Earth during EURO 2008? [via rolf]

German Virtual Earth update

Good news for all German Virtual Earth mash-ups: Microsoft finished an imagery update for entire Germany, based on data delivered by Intergraph (and GeoContent). According to Intergraph’s press release the new maps provide an accuracy of up to 1m in rural and 50cm in urban areas. Additionally, Microsoft’s fantastic Bird’s eye view is now available for 80 German cities.

GoYellow, based on Endoxon (which was partly acquired by Google), seems to be using the same imagery, but somehow the softer coloring and cartography do look better in Virtual Earth.

Theresienwiese in Munich in Virtual Earth:

Theresienwiese in Virtual Earth

and in GoYellow:

Theresienwiese in GoYellow

Same imagery, different visualization. [via Geobranchen.de]

Happel StadiumI hope Austria will follow soon. Next year the Euro 2008 is happening here and the main stadium in Vienna still looks a bit fuzzy. Some parts of Austria are well covered by Herold maps (the Austrian yellow pages company), but they don’t provide an API, so no luck for external applications.

Virtual Earth Hotmap

Virtual Earth HotmapNot only Vienna is heating up this week, we’re heading towards 35°C and more every day, no, even mapping sites are called hot today:
Microsoft released their research project Virtual Earth Hotmap.

Hotmap gives some insights about place popularity and shows where people have looked during the past 6 months in Virtual Earth.

It’s quite interesting that the map, the overall picture, is similar to other (spatial) analysis results we do in our day-to-day job: the map, literally based on hits and page impressions, shows an urban/rural divide and structures along major transport axis. Besides large urban areas, some tourism regions can be identified too – lake regions in Carinthia, skiing regions in Salzburg and Tyrol.

After a quick look at Virtual Earth Hotmap I’d say it provides some interesting data for regional marketing purposes and could be used additionally to other (tourism) website traffic analysis. E.g. if a tourism region doesn’t show up in Hotmap then probably not too many people are looking for information about or even searching directions to it (and going there?).

A good day…

Google Maps Street View…starts with a nice morning walk in SF.

Microsoft’s Virtual Earth 3D still is an impressing technology, but Google’s catch up isn’t bad at all too.

Somehow it reminds me of Amazon A9′s ambitious street views, seen a couple of years ago. Unlike Amazon, who only had street views available if I recall correctly, Google can offer this nice feature, which definitely provides very helpful information for travelers finding a particular place in an unknown area, as addition to already existing mapping features. That way they can easily evaluate user acceptance and benefit of the new 3D-like feature and decide later if they’re going to extend it to more cities.

The main advantage over Virtual Earth 3D is probably that Google’s Street View doesn’t ask – assuming an available Flash plugin – for installing any additional program. [via TechCrunch]

Virtual Earth 3D carrot

No Virtual Earth 3D here

Everybody is talking about Virtual Earth 3D and the only thing I get is this installation message. Why is my language not 3D compatible and what if I don’t care if there is no 3D data in my region available? I would be perfectly happy if I could explore New York in Virtual Earth 3D, even in English!

Guess I’ll depend on screenshot-postings for some more time to see what Virtual Earth 3D is about…

Al Gore’s vision

“I believe we need a ‘Digital Earth’. A multi-resolution, three-dimensional representation of the planet, into which we can embed vast quantities of geo-referenced data.”
(Al Gore, Vice president of the United States of America, 1998)

German digital earth roundup

Google EarthFor all who are able to read (and understand) the german language: there is an interesting article by Martin Soutschek about recent development and impacts caused by Google Earth & co on the geo scene available on Runder Tisch GIS e.V.

I totally agree with all outlined points why Google Earth, Google Maps, etc. are “cool” and “sexy”, but I would like to add one more aspect: the deep personal link between user and geo data created by those spatial applications. What I really could observe on people while they where using Google Earth was that they where searching for places they know. Of course this is a well known habit when people use maps, but suddenly people could see their house, hometown, street, etc. from bird’s eye view. All the abstraction, the hard work done by cartographers, was gone. People identified themselves with what they saw on the map, with all the objects displayed on a image of the world as they know it. Without the use of this partial high resolution imagery this effect wouldn’t have occurred. To bind users on a grand scale one has to access subconscious emotions.

Another point is a result of the impressive usability. Those new services are in general fast and easy to use. A result of this handy usability is that people can use this electronic maps in a way they did it with traditional paper maps. Google Earth allows one to add and save marks on the map, people used to mark their personal points of interest on paper maps. Because of the new map media new methods of map use were found. Now it’s possible to see what other people mark on their maps, one can share places. Freely available APIs inspired developments like geotagging, to add coordinates to photos or other web content and link it with certain places. The way how people interact with digital maps is changing. I think people have fun using those maps. Instead of just using maps to find the shortest connection from A to B they certainly enjoy them.

Sure, Web 2.0 is the buzzword of the year, but I think the cartographic adaptation towards Map 2.0 explains somehow the user-centered approach of those new generation spatial applications.

However, it’s hard to predict what’s coming next. If this whole thing is just a huge geo bubble which will implode soon or if geo applications will soon be an essential part of our everday life. Still more interesting is how GIS industry, cartographers, public authorities, etc. will take part in this development and react on the invasion of companies like Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft, etc. into their territory.

Another point of view on Google Earth brought in by a colleague (a planner) of me: “Google Earth is the proletarysation of geoinformation” – freely available geoinformation for everyone!