Tag Archive for 'Public Information'

What can Towns learn from OpenStreetMap?

Last week at the Ignite Spatial: Boston event I gave a short talk – 5min, 20 automated slides, 15sec each – about OpenStreetMap and why I think it can be interesting for town administrations to look at the OpenStreetMap model. In a nutshell:

  • OpenStreetMap is successfully based on open crowdsourcing, a horizontal multi-directional work-flow model, to build and maintain the world’s largest free geospatial database.
  • Open crowdsourcing helps to collect local knowledge across your residents, improve local geospatial data, engage residents and provide a 24/7 feedback loop for them.
  • Wide variety of data and information distribution: OpenStreetMap allows output from raw data access for developers to print map renderings for tourists.
  • Built-in data interoperability: no matter how many or in what part of the world people are contributing to the project, it all fits together to one piece.

Bottom line: towns should take a serious look at OpenStreetMap and the underlying model. It’s proven to work in many places and provides some valid points town administrations can benefit from.

There should be videos of all presentations online at some point. My colleagues Holly and Chris talked about our 3D video game/planning participation project in Chinatown and about the 10 most wanted data sets (and one state GIS department at stake) we would like to see to for better planning decisions in the Metro Boston region.

Update: Videos of Ignite Spatial: Boston are now available on YouTube. That’s me, struggling through the format ;-)

Public administration video podcast

Surprising, a video podcast at the portal of the Federal State Styria (Austria):

Video podcast Steiermark

It’s still a little buried under press service, well it actually *is* a press service, but yet a beginning. Usually it takes ages until public agencies make use of new technologies. They are not exposed to market laws and therefore have no motivation to modernize themselves regularly and get ahead of competitors.

Maybe we’ll see more social media growing in the public sector during next elections here too. What’s now going on at the US presidential campaigns is just crazy. Some of the candidates really now how to use those tools, to create awareness, attach followers and raise funding through them.

Environmental geo data service

Whenever I have to deal with the European Environmental Agency, I’m deeply impressed by their data service. Basically it’s very simple, no or little fancy online mapping applications, but therefore it offers fast and easy to use data searching and data browsing features. I wish more European Agencies would offer such a service. Finding the right data or indicators can be painfully and, at the worst, take ages.

Besides the downloads, a very convenient feature is that the EEA data service manages your agreements. Especially in the case of national data sets (e.g. Corine land cover) in cross-border regions it’s very useful and time saving. You select the data, fill out a form and the data service takes care about the agreement with each involved national agency. You see all given permissions and details in one single overview, without the need of finding the right person to ask in each country.

Well, finding and talking to the right person can result in new projects, but in this case I was only interested in getting the data quickly.

King Jared!

Jared Bendedict succeeded in his Map Ransom mission and made, as promised, all his purchased data available for download at the Libre Map Project. (via James Fee GIS Blog)

Congratulations, great work!

I was thinking if a similar initiative would succeed here too, but I’m afraid that European copycats would need fundings similar to GNPs of some medium insular state, a bunch of excellent attorneys and a lobbyist better than Nick Nayler to buy and finally free the data of its public copyright.

It’s quite clear that collecting high quality geodata is cost intensive and since there is a noticeable political pressure on public authorities, such as most national mapping agencies are, to act like private companies it’s understandable that they don’t want or can’t distribute their core business freely.

The point is, that small European businesses, start-ups or single geo-developers who can’t afford licensing all needed European geodata are forced to test run their services and applications with American geodata, like the one at Libre Map Project, and deal with American spatial issues or to make use of one of the available geo APIs (mostly focusing the US of course).

Is it in the interest of the European Union to direct grass-root innovation from Europe to the US?

What would be the problem of making outdated European public geodata freely available? Most people would be fine with that. I believe it would ease and push innovation (anyone remembering the Lisbon Strategy?) in the geo industry a lot, simply because geo applications heavily depend, already during conceptual work and development, on data – no data, no development.

Vote for Public Maps - Reject INSPIRE!

Emperors

…don’t want the public to sneak a peek into their palaces. Otherwise why would the Ministry of Information order the Bahrain Internet Exchange to block all access to the Google Earth servers?

Authorities usually don’t get tired telling us again and again that who has nothing done bad, has nothing to hide and nothing to fear when it comes to privacy critical issues like video observations, biometric security or data mining projects (hello AOL!). So I’m wondering what is it what the Kingdom of Bahrain wants to hide from its people. Have you done something bad Bahrain?
Read some more details in this post.

Information means power, free information is the key to a free world.

(via OE)

Czechoslovakia

USA was defeated by Czech Republic yesterday. Czechoslovakia are 2 separated countries for longer than a decade now. It was called Czechoslovakia during the era of Communism, that makes the difference. 98.5 KFOX should send some of its staff back to school.

Moving towards a national GDI

geoland.atTwo years ago the first version of geoland.at, the geodata network between all 9 Austrian Federal states, was presented.

In Austria the National Mapping Agency is responsible for collecting and maintaining basic geodata such as the official topographic map or the digital cadastre. Within the administration (between NMA and ministries, Federal states, governmental agencies, etc.) this state collected data is going to be sold and licensed. Public funds are making their way from the left state-pocket to the right state-pocket. Of course private companies can buy and license this state collected data as well. By 1st January 2006 a new geodata licensing model became effective. It was a huge step in terms of easing access to and understanding of geodata licensing in Austria. Geodata became affordable even for smaller companies without huge data budgets. Some details still need to be discussed, like multi-user licensing questions or geodata licensing for large umbrella companies. What is still missing, but as far as I know our they are working on it, is online access to geodata via OGC webservices. By now you can only access some maps in an online viewer.

However, geoland.at is the effort to make Federal state collected or maintained geodata publicly available. The online viewer gives you access to 9 data different servers. Geoland.at is based on distributed data management in order to keep the data where it’s going to be maintained and updated. Beside technical aspects and semantic data homogenisation (e.g. river doesn’t mean the same type of flowing water in every 9 states), the political motivation behind geoland.at is far more interesting. Basically the most eastern state has no interest to share any geodata with the most western state. Furthermore there isn’t any legal pressure to do so. The 9 Federal states voluntary agreed within the framework of geodata policy and resulting discussions to build this platform and create thereby a counterpart to the National Mapping Agency.

The new addition on geoland.at is a WMS which gives you access to following layers in your preferred GIS client:

  • Road network (federal roads and highways)
  • Administrative boundaries (municipalities, districts and federal states)
  • Rivers
  • Natura 2000 zones
  • Shaded relief
  • City map in Vienna

I had to add http://www.geoland.at/geolandWMS/service.aspx? to my WMS servers in ArcCatalog to make it work.

Since our work highly depends on state collected geodata (and it’s always very time consuming to get access to) I highly appreciate the recent development of providing geodata through OGC webservices. It allows us to bypass the data delivery process by simply adding a WMS to our maps.

Of course every single Federal state still operates its own online geographic information system, where at least metadata searches through most Federal data sets are possible.

There are probably more advanced GDI’s available in various other countries, but having the political background in mind, geoland.at means a major step towards an Austrian GDI.

Talking about INSPIRE

INSPIRELast week started with an interesting email in the PostGIS-list containing a link to Public Geo Data. It’s a campaign aimed to stop the European Parliament from adopting the INSPIRE proposal. Honestly, I was pretty sceptic about that campaign. Of course INSPIRE is not exactly brilliant, but I thought it’s better than nothing, better than the current situation. To make a long story short, I tended to see the glass half full instead of half empty.

Now, one week later and after reading the arguments stated on that site, I see the glass three-quarter empty. Have a close look at this section of the site. Isn’t it simply unbelievable how our public NMAs (National Mapping Agencies) are building back doors side by side where they can leave the directive without guaranteeing access to anything? Anything, ok that’s not quite correct. As far as I remember the text of the proposal they are obliged to make at least metadata publicly available (if thereby intellectual property rights are not violated of course).

Don’t get me wrong. This is not about demanding from our NMAs to give away everything free of charge. I’m well aware that production and maintainance of some of their data is quite cost-intensive. Even if they are fully public funded I would agree that they generate some income by partly licensing their data. Not every single taxpayer takes advantage of geodata to the same degree. As well I understand and agree that access constraints might be a result of national security issues. But enabling access constraints for information created by public authorities just for reasons of intellectual property rights is going way too far!

“the most competitive and knowledge-driven economy by 2010″
(EU heads of state and government, Lisbon, 2000)

If the current INSPIRE proposal will be adopted without any further changes than the Europe based geospatial industry can remove the word “innovation” out of its vocabulary. Why? Well, I’m thinking that a considerable part of innovation is done in “garages”, by small companies or even single developers, where decisions are made fast and uncomplicated and ideas are not blocked by administration. Usually those companies/developers are not blessed with too much budget, so they need some affordable or free data to build and test their geospatial applications, services, ideas, etc.. So which data sources would you consult/suggest in Europe? LANDSAT, VMap0, UNEP, GEOnet Names Server, ESRI Data & Maps (if you call an ArcGIS license your own)… if you can tell me a european one I’ll willingly add it to the list.

Public benefit of public geodata

Last weekend I helped a friend out. His hobby is his website where he and a few others provide information about reptiles in Austria. In one section you can submit information via a form if you have seen a rare species. Once a year this information is handed over to the Natural History Museum in Vienna, all for free of course. Part of the form is information about the place where the animal was found, including coordinates. The user was asked to look up the place in the official topographic map of Austria, paper or online, and enter the sheet number and coordinates, all manually. So I asked him why not embeding something like a Google map where the user can simply click and locate the place. The coordinates would be passed directly to the database. We overworked the form on sunday afternoon, not a big deal, just making use of Google’s API. The feedback of some users was quite impressing.
This friend asked me then why the Austrian Mapping Agency isn’t offering something similar, something simple like this Google map. Well, appearantly it’s part of their policy to keep geodata behind closed doors. They have their own product online where you can view the austrian topographic base map. If you want to embed this map in your website just like we did on this sunday afternoon you’ll have to license it through the “Web-Service License”, a pay-per-click license model. I’m still talking about the topographic raster base map. If I would have told this friend that we have to come to a license agreement with the Austrian Mapping Agency he probably would have answered: “Ok, forget about the map, just add the lat/lon form fields”.
So Google helped us to create a simple non-commercial mapping application for the public benefit (assuming that protection of species is a matter of public interest), something our NMA should do.

What I basically expect from INSPIRE:

  • EU-wide interoperable public geodata
  • guaranteed access to public geodata
  • open access to freely available base maps

I discussed the arguments listed on Public Geo Data and the INSPIRE proposal in my company with my senior. Resulting that I’m allowed to sign the petition as employee of the Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning – Information services (ÖIR-Informationsdienste GmbH).

If you’re living in Europe you should sign too!

For further reading I recommend the article “Why Europe Needs to Provide its Own Public Geodata” by Jo Walsh.

Vote for Public Maps - Reject INSPIRE!

BBC Archive

UK residents only: BBC is offering news reports covering historic events of the past 50 years as download under the “Creative Archive License“.

Article 7

That’s the way how Austria deals with minority rights and pursues minority policy: politicians continuously break constitutional law and our “unprejudiced” public broadcasting corporation (ORF) refuses broadcasting background information.