Usually, when it comes to usability and interface design, Apple enjoys a quite good reputation. Especially the smart and simple iPod design is just brilliant, close to the legendary one-button-system.
This week Apple updated Aperture, added, finally, support for my new camera and made a trial version available. So I got a copy and tried Aperture. Mainly because I wanted to compare it to Adobe Photoshop Lightroom, which is available as public beta.
First off, I’m no professional photographer, just an amateur who is looking for a tool to manage his RAW images in the way iPhoto handles snapshots. I’m not going with iPhoto because it doesn’t take advantage of the RAW format, it converts and copies every RAW picture to another compressed image format. What I’m looking for is probably somewhere in between iPhoto and Lightroom/Aperture.
However, I tried Aperture, imported most of my RAW images and began adjusting, ordering, etc. Without the intention to slug anyone here, but Aperture gave me one of the worst user experiences I’ve ever had. We just didn’t like each other. I wasn’t able to find the most simple things like editing metadata or copy color adjustments from one picture to another (can I?) and Aperture gave me no hint where to look for it either.
Maybe Aperture is just not built for me and my MacBook in matters of usability, screen size and speed.
On the other hand, I had no trouble understanding the interface and concept of Lightroom. In my opinion it’s very clear, more intuitive, a lot snappier and runs overall with a better performance on my MacBook than Aperture.
Both applications seem to do their job well, just in different ways. For amateur photographers like me both products probably mean a feature overkill. If iPhoto would’ve a better RAW handling and slightly better color adjustment features, I would just stick with it.