Tag Archive for 'Europe'

Page 4 of 4

Talking about INSPIRE

INSPIRELast week started with an interesting email in the PostGIS-list containing a link to Public Geo Data. It’s a campaign aimed to stop the European Parliament from adopting the INSPIRE proposal. Honestly, I was pretty sceptic about that campaign. Of course INSPIRE is not exactly brilliant, but I thought it’s better than nothing, better than the current situation. To make a long story short, I tended to see the glass half full instead of half empty.

Now, one week later and after reading the arguments stated on that site, I see the glass three-quarter empty. Have a close look at this section of the site. Isn’t it simply unbelievable how our public NMAs (National Mapping Agencies) are building back doors side by side where they can leave the directive without guaranteeing access to anything? Anything, ok that’s not quite correct. As far as I remember the text of the proposal they are obliged to make at least metadata publicly available (if thereby intellectual property rights are not violated of course).

Don’t get me wrong. This is not about demanding from our NMAs to give away everything free of charge. I’m well aware that production and maintainance of some of their data is quite cost-intensive. Even if they are fully public funded I would agree that they generate some income by partly licensing their data. Not every single taxpayer takes advantage of geodata to the same degree. As well I understand and agree that access constraints might be a result of national security issues. But enabling access constraints for information created by public authorities just for reasons of intellectual property rights is going way too far!

“the most competitive and knowledge-driven economy by 2010″
(EU heads of state and government, Lisbon, 2000)

If the current INSPIRE proposal will be adopted without any further changes than the Europe based geospatial industry can remove the word “innovation” out of its vocabulary. Why? Well, I’m thinking that a considerable part of innovation is done in “garages”, by small companies or even single developers, where decisions are made fast and uncomplicated and ideas are not blocked by administration. Usually those companies/developers are not blessed with too much budget, so they need some affordable or free data to build and test their geospatial applications, services, ideas, etc.. So which data sources would you consult/suggest in Europe? LANDSAT, VMap0, UNEP, GEOnet Names Server, ESRI Data & Maps (if you call an ArcGIS license your own)… if you can tell me a european one I’ll willingly add it to the list.

Public benefit of public geodata

Last weekend I helped a friend out. His hobby is his website where he and a few others provide information about reptiles in Austria. In one section you can submit information via a form if you have seen a rare species. Once a year this information is handed over to the Natural History Museum in Vienna, all for free of course. Part of the form is information about the place where the animal was found, including coordinates. The user was asked to look up the place in the official topographic map of Austria, paper or online, and enter the sheet number and coordinates, all manually. So I asked him why not embeding something like a Google map where the user can simply click and locate the place. The coordinates would be passed directly to the database. We overworked the form on sunday afternoon, not a big deal, just making use of Google’s API. The feedback of some users was quite impressing.
This friend asked me then why the Austrian Mapping Agency isn’t offering something similar, something simple like this Google map. Well, appearantly it’s part of their policy to keep geodata behind closed doors. They have their own product online where you can view the austrian topographic base map. If you want to embed this map in your website just like we did on this sunday afternoon you’ll have to license it through the “Web-Service License”, a pay-per-click license model. I’m still talking about the topographic raster base map. If I would have told this friend that we have to come to a license agreement with the Austrian Mapping Agency he probably would have answered: “Ok, forget about the map, just add the lat/lon form fields”.
So Google helped us to create a simple non-commercial mapping application for the public benefit (assuming that protection of species is a matter of public interest), something our NMA should do.

What I basically expect from INSPIRE:

  • EU-wide interoperable public geodata
  • guaranteed access to public geodata
  • open access to freely available base maps

I discussed the arguments listed on Public Geo Data and the INSPIRE proposal in my company with my senior. Resulting that I’m allowed to sign the petition as employee of the Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning – Information services (ÖIR-Informationsdienste GmbH).

If you’re living in Europe you should sign too!

For further reading I recommend the article “Why Europe Needs to Provide its Own Public Geodata” by Jo Walsh.

Vote for Public Maps - Reject INSPIRE!

Ask.com maps

Ask.comSince when is Ask.com providing maps? Did I miss something? Not only they are catching up to Google, Microsoft, Yahoo!, ESRI, etc. but also they offer some detailed street maps of Europe. Quite exciting for us here in Europe!

The whole application is very similar to other (familiar) mapping products. Based on image tiles (no Flash so far), with zooming, panning and search options as usual.

Basically the gazetteer seems to work for european places. Well, basically. I wasn’t able to locate Vienna (“Wien”), the austrian capital, instead it suggested me almost every european one-horse-town containing the word “Wien”. But, after all, I achieved to find out the walking distance from “Waidhofen an der Ybbs” to “Sankt Pölten”. Switching between walking and driving gives you different routes, as it should be.

What’s missing, or at least it was hiding from me, is an API or a documentation respectively. I’m not sure if Ask.com is working on an API or if they simply don’t want you to take advanage of their maps and embed them within other websites.

However, good to see a more detailed Europe appearing in those mapping products. Since our INSPIRE will probably end up as NMA-coopartion to avoid publicly available geodata we will partly depend on the goodwill of those companies.

Update #1:
The Cartography weblog and All Points Blog already reported yesterday about it. Check those sites for some more information on Ask.com maps.

Polished EU

Successful PPP (Politics Posters Porn): Carlos Aires & Tanja Ostojic’s 25peaces contribution to spice up EU’s image.

Galileo launch

GIOVE-AGIOVE-A (Galileo In-Orbit Validation Element A), Galileo’s first demonstrator satellite, is being launched today. Galileo is without doubt one of EU’s most important projects. It offers the possibility to cut dependency from US’s Global Positioning System or Russian’s GLONASS (expected completion by 2008). One major difference between those services – Galileo, GLONASS and GPS – is that Galileo will be a civil system, run by a private consortium and guarentee uninterrupted service. Now european sat-nav businesses, such as aviation and maritime industries, directly depend on (foreign) military decisions.

Yet both military operators can downgrade or even switch off the signal whenever the need it. Of course switching of GPS for civil use would affect global economy as well and it wouldn’t be reasonable, but in the long run this dependency couldn’t be considered as favourably for EU. ESA (European Space Agency) lists the european independence as chief reason for developing Galileo. Nevertheless will Galileo be interoperable with GPS and GLONASS and will be a cornerstone of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) as ESA declares.
Furthermore Galileo should come with more positioning accuaracy than existing systems, expected down to 1m and even less.

Certainly Galileo is costing a lot of money, estimated 3.6 billion EUR for 2020. PriceWaterhousCoopers, who developed the business plan, estimate the total benefits of the project at EUR 17.8 billion in Net Profit Value, implying a strongly positive benefit cost ratio of 4.6. Well, I don’t have the background nor am I in the position to judge this numbers. In my opinion the aspect to initiate new Europe-based businesses around Galilieo is priceless. Almost the same strategy was embarked when EU decided to initiate Airbus. As history has shown it was a successful plan.
Similar intentions are behind certain efforts to bring open source software into public administrations: to achieve independence from some software companies and to establish local software development businesses along with knowledge transfer.

According to its schedule Galileo should be going into service in 2008 and is expected to be fully operational by 2010.

I think Galileo is worth the cost. On the one hand because of the mentioned achieved independence and on the other hand I’m confident that it’ll push innovations on new european geospatial services, products, applications and businesses.

Further information on Galileo:
ESA: The future – Galileo
BBC News Q&A: Europe’s Galileo project

The agreement between EU and USA, which basically contains cooperation and interoperability issues of GPS and Galileo, is available here. Especially Article 7 “Open Access to Civil Satellite-based Navigation or Timing Signals” called my attention. It starts with “1. Except for reasons of national security, …”, meaning either USA or EU can demand from each other to downgrade or switch off the signal for certain regions/users if some bad terrorist appears with GPS- or Galileo-guided weapons of mass destruction…

Я русск

I never would have thought this. Maybe I seriously should consider Russia as my next holiday destination – always wanted to see St. Petersburg – but unfortunately it’s so cold up there…

Your Inner European is Russian!
russian
Mysterious and exotic.
You’ve got a great balance of danger and allure.