Tag Archive for 'Creative Commons'

OpenStreetMap as WMS

Another option to integrate rendered OpenStreetMap images in a GIS desktop client or web application is to add OpenStreetMap as OGC compliant Web Map Service. For the European continent such a service is now provided by the German WhereGroup.

The service is available as a free basic WMS (GetCapabilities), updated biannually, and two commercial versions, updated daily, for specific map customization needs and high performances.

OpenStreetMap is on the way to become a serious alternative map source in professional GIS environments. The question how the professional GIS community responds to Creative Commons licensing will surely open some interesting debates anytime soon.

The OpenStreetMap Shapefiles

Yesterday, after reading the post about routeable OSM data, I discovered the download section of CloudMade. By country they offer OSM data in various file formats. Shapefile is one of them. I downloaded the Austrian OSM data as Shapefile (still, after decades, the unbeaten #1 file format when it comes to geodata interoperability btw). There are 3 filesets included: highways, POI and natural.

After loading them into QGIS and having a quick look at the data, I must say that I’m impressed by the data quality and level of detail. Recently I proposed that our public national mapping agency should support projects like OpenStreetMap and provide parts of their road network data to the OSM community. Hereby I take this proposal back, I should’ve had a look at recent OSM updates first. The OSM road network data is, after some initial checks, better than what I’ve seen so far from our national mapping agency for general mapping purposes.

Dear mapping agency,
I’m afraid some of your departments are obsolete by now. You simply missed the train. The community has taken over your job and does it with friendlier, and probably more sustainable, licensing.

What I’ve to figure out now is a simple process how to send data edits on the Shapefile back to the OSM database. There is a good chance that we, while using the data in projects, will work on and maybe improve attributes or features. A smart tool to bridge desktop GIS and the OSM database would be very helpful here.

Another thing is to create more awareness about CC licensing and what community based work means. I’m quite often confronted with share-unfriendly attitudes like “pull down what you can get but don’t give anything in return”. There is very little understanding that sharing your work and data, base data to build individual projects on, creates a bigger benefit for all parties. I guess it’s a relic of times where geodata has been the most precious treasure you had to hide…

Model Release

kids delightNever heard of that term before. Apparently it’s the agreement between photographer (or publisher) and human subject about picture rights and further picture use [Wikipedia explains it better].

How come?

I was reading a post about the issue were Virgin Mobile took a photo from Flickr and used it in an ad campaign. The photo was licensed under Creative Commons (CC). As you can see on the picture of the ad, Virgin Mobile fulfilled the attribution condition by properly indicating the author. What happened was that the girl showing up on the picture felt insulted (and well, her family smelt the money I suppose) and filed a lawsuit against Virgin Mobile and others.

As far as I understood, and I’m no lawyer, the one violating the girl’s rights was the Flickr user and not Virgin Mobile. It was the Flickr user who published the taken picture online under a CC license without holding the model release in his hands. Virgin Mobile made use of the picture by respecting the underlying license. But that’s just my theory.

The outcome of this lawsuit will be interesting though. Especially the piont what’s a Creative Commons license worth in a court. Supposedly the same as any other license agreement, but you never can tell.

I have a Flickr account too, meaning I publish pictures online. All of my photos are licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA and on some of them you can identify random persons, and I do not own a single model release.

Should I be concerned?

I’m not quite sure. According to the rather simple CC license text, anybody who wants to use my pictures commercially must ask for my permission first. So Virgin Mobile couldn’t just use my picture in a campaign without letting me know. On the other hand my license does allow non-commercial sharing, under certain conditions, but basically it gives me no control where my photos are going to show up.

BBC Archive

UK residents only: BBC is offering news reports covering historic events of the past 50 years as download under the “Creative Archive License“.

Thieves

Consumers tend to be thieves as stated by some persons from major music labels. There is no way to trust them! For this reason major music producers must use the state of the art to protect their (intellectual) property.

Musicians are thieves by nature and at least 16 of them admit it.

Get, sample and share The Wired Creative Commons CD!

Update to add some french thieves:

� P2P, nous sommes tous des pirates �