A few days ago I discussed with a colleague ways to publish maps, analysis results or to provide analysis tasks within an organisation. We were talking about a quite common corporate geomarketing challenge (I suppose, since we’re no geomarketing experts): a specialised department analyses spatially distributed marketing data and provides other departments with their results. Whereas the presentation of results should be somewhere in between PowerPoint slides and a full functional desktop GIS client. Honestly it was quite hard to seperate various publishing options, identify the optimal tasks and features and combine them to the best individual publishing solution. Along with recent developments on server-side GIS software, powerful new generation geo viewers like the popular Google Earth or the upcoming ArcGIS Explorer offer content providers quite an alternative to well-established map publishing solutions like mapservers do for instance.
So today I tried to sum up a few map publishing solutions I know and figure out their pros and cons, their qualities. Just to clarify: this list is not exhaustive. It’s an overview and the result of a short brainstorming to have a note for further discussions on that topic in my pocket. Comments or suggestions will be highly appreciated!
Pros:
- Out of the box viewer
- Local map viewer
- Optional 3D (ArcGlobe)
- “Familiar” GIS application interface
- Advanced map layouts
- Data encryption
- Viewer customisation
Cons:
- Viewer installation
- Local map file
- Limited base maps (e.g. provided by geography network)
- Extension for map authoring needed
- Limited viewer functionality
Google Earth, ArcGIS Explorer (upcoming)
Pros:
- Out of the box viewer
- 3D
- already integrated access to base maps
- OGC Webservice support (upcoming in GE?)
- Local data support (KML, Shp, PGDB)
- Customised tasks (AGX)
- User acceptance (GE)
Cons:
- Viewer installation
- 3D only
- Mainly data viewer
- Limited map layout authoring
- Internet/Intranet access required or recommended
- Ads (upcoming in GE)
Webmapserver e.g. Mapserver, ArcIMS, deegree,…
Pros:
- Out of the box browser interface
- Platform independent
- Customisable user interface and functionality
- OGC Webservice support (embed or provide)
- Access to base maps by third party API (Google local, ArcWeb, Yahoo!, etc.)
Cons:
- Browser interface
- Last & performance
- Development effort
ArcGIS Server, GRASS, GDAL, etc.
Pros:
- Browser interface
- Platform independent
- Customisable user interface and functionality
- Customised advanced tasks
Cons:
- Browser interface
- Last & performance
- Development effort
So it gives me two of this popups, every time on every single input box on every opened window. I don’t know how much time I already spent on clicking those popups away until I changed my regional settings to US standards (as the only one in my company). So far I didn’t run into problems with other applications or data exchange with some colleagues. On certain formats we have to mind that we’re using different comma-settings.