<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: European geodata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/</link>
	<description>a personal website slash blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/comment-page-1/#comment-26381</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/#comment-26381</guid>
		<description>Well, anyone who has ever loaded TIGER and GISCO into a GIS application can tell the difference. I fully agree, the European approach towards free geodata is simply depressing and totally outdated. &lt;a href=http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=2107&amp;trv=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This article&lt;/a&gt; has some good points and theories about that issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, anyone who has ever loaded TIGER and GISCO into a GIS application can tell the difference. I fully agree, the European approach towards free geodata is simply depressing and totally outdated. <a href=http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=2107&#038;trv=1" rel="nofollow">This article</a> has some good points and theories about that issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vidar Hokstad</title>
		<link>http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/comment-page-1/#comment-26376</link>
		<dc:creator>Vidar Hokstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/#comment-26376</guid>
		<description>Comparing this data with TIGER is an insult to the US Census Bureau, both given the data that&#039;s included and given the restrictions.

It&#039;s comical, in a very depressing way, that the US leads the way in providing free, unencumbered GIS data (and all the other federally funded databases they publish in the public domain), while European governments insists on holding on to restrictions that don&#039;t belong anywhere on taxpayer funded data.

I suspect the only way this data will be &quot;liberated&quot; in Europe is through projects like Geonames duplicating the government efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing this data with TIGER is an insult to the US Census Bureau, both given the data that&#8217;s included and given the restrictions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s comical, in a very depressing way, that the US leads the way in providing free, unencumbered GIS data (and all the other federally funded databases they publish in the public domain), while European governments insists on holding on to restrictions that don&#8217;t belong anywhere on taxpayer funded data.</p>
<p>I suspect the only way this data will be &#8220;liberated&#8221; in Europe is through projects like Geonames duplicating the government efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/comment-page-1/#comment-26372</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/#comment-26372</guid>
		<description>Right Jeff. I guess a lot of organizations will be looking for new data sources soon. In the new GISCO data all countries except EU/EFTA/Candidates were eliminated, which creates a very strange picture of Europe. Unlike the 2003 GISCO data where North Africa, parts of the Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, etc. were included.

Personally I find it questionable that EUROSTAT, as part of the EU Commission, paints that strange image of Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right Jeff. I guess a lot of organizations will be looking for new data sources soon. In the new GISCO data all countries except EU/EFTA/Candidates were eliminated, which creates a very strange picture of Europe. Unlike the 2003 GISCO data where North Africa, parts of the Middle East, Ukraine, Russia, etc. were included.</p>
<p>Personally I find it questionable that EUROSTAT, as part of the EU Commission, paints that strange image of Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Thurston</title>
		<link>http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/comment-page-1/#comment-26370</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Thurston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spanring.eu/blog/2008/02/20/european-geodata/#comment-26370</guid>
		<description>Good post Christian. 
You are of course quite right. In fact, I delved into this and reached this point.
----
United Kingdom

UTS levels 2 and 3
In Scotland, the border between North Eastern Scotland and Highlands and Islands will be shifted by moving east Moray to the latter region. This will affect the borders at both NUTS level 2 and level 3.

A number of region names are being changed or corrected at all NUTS levels, in various parts of the United Kingdom.

All changes in the European regional classification will enter into force on 1 January 2008. For technical reasons, we will switch to the new version of NUTS (NUTS 2007/EU-27) in our dissemination database in late autumn 2007.
---------

Now try reading that real fast. It is confusing. 

Alas, the INSPIRE Directive stipulates that this sort of data will become freely available - at least that is the intent. Then, folks may proceed to make a living while going nuts. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Christian.<br />
You are of course quite right. In fact, I delved into this and reached this point.<br />
&#8212;-<br />
United Kingdom</p>
<p>UTS levels 2 and 3<br />
In Scotland, the border between North Eastern Scotland and Highlands and Islands will be shifted by moving east Moray to the latter region. This will affect the borders at both NUTS level 2 and level 3.</p>
<p>A number of region names are being changed or corrected at all NUTS levels, in various parts of the United Kingdom.</p>
<p>All changes in the European regional classification will enter into force on 1 January 2008. For technical reasons, we will switch to the new version of NUTS (NUTS 2007/EU-27) in our dissemination database in late autumn 2007.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Now try reading that real fast. It is confusing. </p>
<p>Alas, the INSPIRE Directive stipulates that this sort of data will become freely available &#8211; at least that is the intent. Then, folks may proceed to make a living while going nuts. <img src='http://spanring.eu/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

